<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nurses for Reform Blog &#187; Gordon Brown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nursesforreformblog.com/tag/gordon-brown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nursesforreformblog.com</link>
	<description>The blog for Nurses for Reform, a growing pan-European network of nurses dedicated to consumer-oriented reform of European healthcare systems.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:08:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is it true that No.10 cut back on the drink driving adds because of NFR? Is Gordon Brown finally listening?</title>
		<link>http://www.nursesforreformblog.com/2010/01/26/is-it-true-that-no-10-cut-back-on-the-drink-driving-adds-because-of-nfr-is-gordon-brown-finally-listening/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nursesforreformblog.com/2010/01/26/is-it-true-that-no-10-cut-back-on-the-drink-driving-adds-because-of-nfr-is-gordon-brown-finally-listening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Helen Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NHS Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drink driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nurses for Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nursesforreformblog.com/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I was told something very strange. If it is true, then it is quite a coup. But so far, I simply don’t know.
Did you happen to notice that this Christmas there were fewer government drink driving adds on the television? I don’t always watch a lot of TV and I honestly don’t know about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-311" title="Dr" src="http://www.nursesforreformblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Dr17-225x300.jpg" alt="Dr" width="81" height="108" />Yesterday I was told something very strange. If it is true, then it is quite a coup. But so far, I simply don’t know.</p>
<p>Did you happen to notice that this Christmas there were fewer government drink driving adds on the television? I don’t always watch a lot of TV and I honestly don’t know about this. But, apparently, having written <a href="http://blog.iea.org.uk/?p=552 " target="_blank">this</a> and <a href="http://www.nursesforreformblog.com/2009/08/18/nfr-call-to-action-nhs-now-malnourishes-10-times-more-people-than-uk-roads-kill/" target="_blank">this</a> I am advised that the government decided to do less preaching this Christmas.</p>
<p>Was it NFR? Was it that there is an election coming up and politicians don’t want to appear to be too nanny-ish? Were there really fewer drink driving adds on the box? I simply don’t know. You tell me. Is this true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nursesforreformblog.com/2010/01/26/is-it-true-that-no-10-cut-back-on-the-drink-driving-adds-because-of-nfr-is-gordon-brown-finally-listening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
